People v. Ames

275 A.D.2d 467, 712 N.Y.S.2d 898, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8914

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Giaccio, J.), rendered May 18, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and criminal trespass in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[468]*468The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s challenge for cause of a prospective juror (see, People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600; People v Blyden, 55 NY2d 73).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ames, 275 A.D.2d 467, 712 N.Y.S.2d 898, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

275 A.D.2d 467 (People v. Ames) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Johnson
730 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
People v. Blyden
432 N.E.2d 758 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)