People v. Ames

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ames

115 A.D.2d 545, 496 N.Y.S.2d 68, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54954

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 115 A.D.2d 545 (People v. Ames) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ames, 115 A.D.2d 545, 496 N.Y.S.2d 68, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54954 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.), rendered April 9, 1981, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant was convicted of stealing a wallet from the pocketbook of the owner of a fabric store. The wallet, which was not recovered, contained several items, including a Plymouth Shops credit card. The complainant testified that she called the Plymouth Shops to report the theft. This was [546]*546sufficient evidence that the credit card was valid and unexpired when stolen to justify the jury’s verdict (Penal Law § 155.30 [4]; General Business Law § 511 [1]).

We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Gibbons, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.), rendered April 9, 1981, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant was convicted of stealing a wallet from the pocketbook of the owner of a fabric store. The wallet, which was not recovered, contained several items, including a Plymouth Shops credit card. The complainant testified that she called the Plymouth Shops to report the theft. This was [546]*546sufficient evidence that the credit card was valid and unexpired when stolen to justify the jury’s verdict (Penal Law § 155.30 [4]; General Business Law § 511 [1]).

We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Gibbons, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.D.2d 545, 496 N.Y.S.2d 68, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ames-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack