People v. Amer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Amer

159 A.D.2d 948, 555 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3225

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 159 A.D.2d 948 (People v. Amer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Amer, 159 A.D.2d 948, 555 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3225 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the entry, search and seizure were justified by exigent circumstances and the plain-view doctrine.

We affirm for the reasons stated by the suppression court, Drury, J. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Dadd, J. — criminal sale of controlled substance, second degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Law-ton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the entry, search and seizure were justified by exigent circumstances and the plain-view doctrine.

We affirm for the reasons stated by the suppression court, Drury, J. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Dadd, J. — criminal sale of controlled substance, second degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Law-ton and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 A.D.2d 948, 555 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-amer-nyappdiv-1990.