People v. Amendolare

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Amendolare

187 N.E.2d 793, 12 N.Y.2d 867

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 31, 1962

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 187 N.E.2d 793 (People v. Amendolare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Amendolare, 187 N.E.2d 793, 12 N.Y.2d 867 (N.Y. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed, the complaint dismissed and the fine remitted upon the ground that some of the evidence introduced [868]*868to prove the violation of section 986-b of the Penal Law was illegally obtained (Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643; People v. Loria, 10 N Y 2d 368) and its introduction excepted to (People v. O’Neill, 11 N Y 2d 148). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed, the complaint dismissed and the fine remitted upon the ground that some of the evidence introduced [868]*868to prove the violation of section 986-b of the Penal Law was illegally obtained (Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643; People v. Loria, 10 N Y 2d 368) and its introduction excepted to (People v. O’Neill, 11 N Y 2d 148). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 N.E.2d 793, 12 N.Y.2d 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-amendolare-ny-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack