People v. Ambubakr

40 A.D.3d 273, 833 N.Y.S.2d 393

This text of 40 A.D.3d 273 (People v. Ambubakr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ambubakr, 40 A.D.3d 273, 833 N.Y.S.2d 393 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Brenda Soloff, J.), rendered January 30, 2006, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of three years, unanimously affirmed.

For the reasons stated in our decision in People v Lemos (34 AD3d 343 [2006]), we find unpreserved, and in any event unavailing, defendant’s argument that the court unlawfully imposed a mandatory surcharge and fees when it did so only in writing.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Friedman, J.E, Marlow, Sullivan, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lemos
34 A.D.3d 343 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 A.D.3d 273, 833 N.Y.S.2d 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ambubakr-nyappdiv-2007.