People v. Ambrosino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ambrosino

20 A.D.2d 793, 248 N.Y.S.2d 73, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4278

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 2, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.D.2d 793 (People v. Ambrosino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ambrosino, 20 A.D.2d 793, 248 N.Y.S.2d 73, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4278 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 29, 1962 after a jury trial, convicting him of unlawful entry as a misdemeanor, and sentencing him to serve an indeterminate term, not exceeding three years, in the New York City Penitentiary, pursuant to the provisions of article 7-A of the Correction Law. Defendant’s sole contention on this appeal is that the sentence to an indeterminate term constituted reversible error, and that for the misdemeanor of which he was convicted the court was required to sentence him to serve [794]*794a definite, fixed term of imprisonment. Judgment affirmed (see People v. Watson, 19 A D 2d 631). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 29, 1962 after a jury trial, convicting him of unlawful entry as a misdemeanor, and sentencing him to serve an indeterminate term, not exceeding three years, in the New York City Penitentiary, pursuant to the provisions of article 7-A of the Correction Law. Defendant’s sole contention on this appeal is that the sentence to an indeterminate term constituted reversible error, and that for the misdemeanor of which he was convicted the court was required to sentence him to serve [794]*794a definite, fixed term of imprisonment. Judgment affirmed (see People v. Watson, 19 A D 2d 631). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 793, 248 N.Y.S.2d 73, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ambrosino-nyappdiv-1964.