People v. Ambrose

272 A.D.2d 951, 707 N.Y.S.2d 921, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8135

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record supports County Court’s determination [952] in this bench trial that the complainant’s deposition was inadvertently lost and that, despite efforts to locate the deposition, it was not available for use at trial (see, People v Walker, 258 AD2d 964, lv denied 93 NY2d 981). The court’s decision to sanction the People therefor by drawing an adverse inference with respect to complainant’s trial testimony was a proper exercise of the court’s discretion (see generally, People v Banch, 80 NY2d 610, 616; People v Martinez, 71 NY2d 937, 940). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Smith, J.— Sexual Abuse, 1st Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ambrose, 272 A.D.2d 951, 707 N.Y.S.2d 921, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8135 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

272 A.D.2d 951 (People v. Ambrose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Martinez
524 N.E.2d 134 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Banch
608 N.E.2d 1069 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
Liberty Healthcare Management Group, Inc. v. Fahey
258 A.D.2d 964 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)