People v. Amaturo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Amaturo

12 A.D.3d 613, 784 N.Y.S.2d 377, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14257

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 22, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.3d 613 (People v. Amaturo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Amaturo, 12 A.D.3d 613, 784 N.Y.S.2d 377, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14257 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by [614]*614the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hinrichs, J.), rendered July 15, 2003, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of grand larceny in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI