People v. Amaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Amaro

99 A.D.2d 997, 473 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17422

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 20, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 99 A.D.2d 997 (People v. Amaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Amaro, 99 A.D.2d 997, 473 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17422 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Goldfluss, J.), rendered on April 14, 1982, unanimously affirmed. I Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this [998]*998record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Ross, Silverman and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Goldfluss, J.), rendered on April 14, 1982, unanimously affirmed. I Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this [998]*998record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Ross, Silverman and Milonas, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.D.2d 997, 473 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-amaro-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack