Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Amaobi

People v. Amaobi

82 A.D.3d 901, 918 N.Y.2d 372
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 8, 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 82 A.D.3d 901 (People v. Amaobi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Amaobi, 82 A.D.3d 901, 918 N.Y.2d 372 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence. The police pursuit of the defendant and subsequent recovery of a handgun were based on police observations that the defendant was committing a crime and then fled when the police approached him (see People v Holmes, 81 NY2d 1056, 1057-1058 [1993]; People v Wynn, 25 AD3d 576, 577 [2006]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Delgado, 80 NY2d 780, 783 [1992]). Mastro, J.E, Balkin, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Holmes
619 N.E.2d 396 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Delgado
80 N.Y.2d 780 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Wynn
25 A.D.3d 576 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 A.D.3d 901, 918 N.Y.2d 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-amaobi-nyappdiv-2011.