People v. Amabile

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Amabile

194 A.D.2d 681, 599 N.Y.S.2d 1003

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 194 A.D.2d 681 (People v. Amabile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Amabile, 194 A.D.2d 681, 599 N.Y.S.2d 1003 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.), both rendered July 1, 1992, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and attempted resisting arrest under S.C.I. No. 81795, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (two counts) under S.C.I. No. 81796, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed, and the matters are remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

The record reveals that the defendant’s pleas of guilty were knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered. Appellate review of the remaining issues raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of the plea bargains. Accordingly, the judgments are affirmed (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.), both rendered July 1, 1992, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and attempted resisting arrest under S.C.I. No. 81795, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (two counts) under S.C.I. No. 81796, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed, and the matters are remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

The record reveals that the defendant’s pleas of guilty were knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered. Appellate review of the remaining issues raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of the plea bargains. Accordingly, the judgments are affirmed (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 A.D.2d 681, 599 N.Y.S.2d 1003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-amabile-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack