People v. Alvarez

2019 NY Slip Op 613
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 30, 2019
DocketInd. No. 3997/15
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 613 (People v. Alvarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Alvarez, 2019 NY Slip Op 613 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Alvarez (2019 NY Slip Op 00613)
People v Alvarez
2019 NY Slip Op 00613
Decided on January 30, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 30, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
SHERI S. ROMAN
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2016-04023
(Ind. No. 3997/15)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Marco Alvarez, appellant.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Victor Barrall of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Elizabeth Foley, J.), imposed March 28, 2016, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Bryant, 28 NY3d 1094, 1096; People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 339-342; People v Batista, 167 AD3d 69, 73-74; People v Brown, 161 AD3d 766). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255).

LEVENTHAL, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN, MALTESE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Bryant
68 N.E.3d 60 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-alvarez-nyappdiv-2019.