People v. Alvarez

248 A.D.2d 718, 671 N.Y.S.2d 273, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3403
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Alvarez. Read the opinion of the Court — 223 A.D.2d 401

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenberg, J.), rendered September 25, 1996, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court’s Sandoval ruling was a proper exercise of its discretion (see, People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455; People v Mackey, 49 NY2d 274; People v Jamison, 228 AD2d 698; People v Pitts, 218 AD2d 715; People v Bonnette, 216 AD2d 479).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Alvarez, 248 A.D.2d 718, 671 N.Y.S.2d 273, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3403 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

248 A.D.2d 718 (People v. Alvarez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Walker
633 N.E.2d 472 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Mackey
401 N.E.2d 398 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Bonnette
216 A.D.2d 479 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Pitts
218 A.D.2d 715 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Jamison
228 A.D.2d 698 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)