People v. Alvarez

177 A.D.2d 701
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Alvarez. Read the opinion of the Court — 166 A.D.2d 603

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenberg, J.), rendered August 3 1989, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, possession of burglar’s tools, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, reversal is not warranted in this case based on certain comments made by the prosecutor during summation. The prosecutor’s remarks concerning the credibility of the People’s witnesses were a fair response to the defense summation in which defense counsel accused them of lying (see, People v DeMaio, 154 AD2d 386; People v Oakley, 114 AD2d 473). Eiber, J. P., Rosenblatt, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Alvarez, 177 A.D.2d 701 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

177 A.D.2d 701 (People v. Alvarez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Oakley
114 A.D.2d 473 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Demaio
154 A.D.2d 386 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)