People v. Alvarado

2025 NY Slip Op 00974
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 19, 2025
DocketInd. No. 72577/22
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 00974 (People v. Alvarado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Alvarado, 2025 NY Slip Op 00974 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Alvarado (2025 NY Slip Op 00974)
People v Alvarado
2025 NY Slip Op 00974
Decided on February 19, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 19, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, J.P.
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
HELEN VOUTSINAS
CARL J. LANDICINO, JJ.

2022-10523
(Ind. No. 72577/22)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Dennys Alvarado, also known as Rene Martinez, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Brian Perbix of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Morgan J. Dennehy, and Allison Marculitis of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Matthew Sciarrino, Jr., J.), rendered December 9, 2022, convicting him of assault in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review an order of protection issued at the time of sentencing.

ORDERED that upon the appeal from the judgment, the order of protection issued at the time of sentencing is vacated, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice; and it is further,

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court improperly issued the order of protection in favor of the individual named therein is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Nieves, 2 NY3d 310, 316-318), but we nevertheless reach the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. As the People correctly concede, the court had no authority to issue an order of protection in favor of the individual named therein since he was neither victim of, nor witness to, the crime to which the defendant entered a plea of guilty (see CPL 530.13[4]; People v Lebron, _____ AD3d _____, 2024 NY Slip Op 06060; People v Fletcher, 220 AD3d 805).

Accordingly, we vacate the order of protection issued at the time of sentencing.

IANNACCI, J.P., BRATHWAITE NELSON, VOUTSINAS and LANDICINO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Nieves
811 N.E.2d 13 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
People v. Fletcher
198 N.Y.S.3d 708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Lebron
2024 NY Slip Op 06060 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 00974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-alvarado-nyappdiv-2025.