People v. Alvarado
This text of 122 A.D.3d 431 (People v. Alvarado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berk-man, J.), rendered June 20, 2012, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of three years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant was properly adjudicated a second felony offender on the basis of a conviction under a Florida evidence-tampering statute. Based on a reasonable reading of the Florida statute (Fla Stat § 918.13), we find that it is equivalent to a New York felony (Penal Law § 215.40). The Florida statute does not apply to intangible evidence, its prohibition of the removal of evidence corresponds to suppressing evidence by concealment, alteration or destruction under the New York analog, and, like the New York statute, the Florida statute requires specific intent for both its destruction and fabrication prongs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 A.D.3d 431, 994 N.Y.S.2d 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-alvarado-nyappdiv-2014.