People v. Alvarado

122 A.D.3d 431, 994 N.Y.S.2d 861
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Alvarado. Read the opinion of the Court — 126 A.D.3d 803
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 2014·No. 13441 5573/11·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berk-man, J.), rendered June 20, 2012, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of three years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was properly adjudicated a second felony offender on the basis of a conviction under a Florida evidence-tampering statute. Based on a reasonable reading of the Florida statute (Fla Stat § 918.13), we find that it is equivalent to a New York felony (Penal Law § 215.40). The Florida statute does not apply to intangible evidence, its prohibition of the removal of evidence corresponds to suppressing evidence by concealment, alteration or destruction under the New York analog, and, like the New York statute, the Florida statute requires specific intent for both its destruction and fabrication prongs.

Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Tom, Renwick and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Alvarado, 122 A.D.3d 431, 994 N.Y.S.2d 861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

122 A.D.3d 431 (People v. Alvarado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 215.40
New York PEN § 215.40