People v. Alvarado

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Alvarado

164 N.W.2d 678, 13 Mich. App. 610, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1114

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 21, 1968

DocketDocket No. 5,296

StatusPublished

This text of 164 N.W.2d 678 (People v. Alvarado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Alvarado, 164 N.W.2d 678, 13 Mich. App. 610, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1114 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

During trial on a charge of second-degree murder, defendant offered and the recorder’s court accepted a plea of guilty to the crime of manslaughter, CL 1948, § 750.321 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.553). On September 22, 1964, the recorder’s court sentenced defendant to 6 to 15 years in prison. Following the filing of defendant’s brief in this Court, the prosecuting attorney filed a motion to affirm the conviction. GCR 1963, 817.5(3).

The five questions raised in defendant’s brief are so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal [611]*611submission. We find no error in defendant’s conviction. Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted. Defendant’s conviction is affirmed.

Lesinski, C. J., and J. H. GIillis and Quinn, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

During trial on a charge of second-degree murder, defendant offered and the recorder’s court accepted a plea of guilty to the crime of manslaughter, CL 1948, § 750.321 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.553). On September 22, 1964, the recorder’s court sentenced defendant to 6 to 15 years in prison. Following the filing of defendant’s brief in this Court, the prosecuting attorney filed a motion to affirm the conviction. GCR 1963, 817.5(3).

The five questions raised in defendant’s brief are so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal [611]*611submission. We find no error in defendant’s conviction. Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted. Defendant’s conviction is affirmed.

Lesinski, C. J., and J. H. GIillis and Quinn, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 N.W.2d 678, 13 Mich. App. 610, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-alvarado-michctapp-1968.