People v. Altreche
This text of 168 A.D.2d 500 (People v. Altreche) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Appelman, J.), rendered December 13, 1988, convicting her of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, without a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress evidence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
[501]*501Since the defendant failed to make a sufficient prima facie factual showing in her motion papers to warrant a Mapp suppression hearing, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of her omnibus motion (see, People v Reynolds, 71 NY2d 552; People v Covington, 144 AD2d 238; People v Gill, 138 AD2d 738).
The sentence imposed was not unduly harsh or excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Kooper, Sullivan and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 A.D.2d 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-altreche-nyappdiv-1990.