People v. Alston
This text of 86 A.D.3d 553 (People v. Alston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[554]*554“A departure from the presumptive risk level is warranted where ‘there exists an aggravating or mitigating factor of a kind, or to a degree, that is otherwise not adequately taken into account by the guidelines’ ” (People v Bussie, 83 AD3d 920, 920-921 [2011], Iv denied 17 NY3d 704 [2011], quoting Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 4 [2006]; see People v Cruz, 74 AD3d 1305, 1306 [2010]). Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that the defendant was not entitled to a downward departure and, thus, properly designated the defendant a level three sex offender (see People v Sivells, 83 AD3d 1027 [2011]; People v Bussie, 83 AD3d 920 [2011]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are improperly raised for the first time on appeal. Rivera, J.E, Florio, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 A.D.3d 553, 926 N.Y.2d 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-alston-nyappdiv-2011.