People v. Alston

254 A.D.2d 158, 684 N.Y.S.2d 877, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11150
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Alston. Read the opinion of the Court — 243 A.D.2d 573

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Carruthers, J.), rendered April 12, 1996, convicting [159]*159defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the matter remanded for a new trial.

The People conceded that a recently located Desk Appearance Ticket report concerning the arrest of the buyer in this observation sale was actually in the People’s possession at the time of trial. We remanded for a factual determination as to whether this undisclosed Rosario material was the duplicative equivalent of disclosed material (People v Ranghelle, 69 NY2d 56). On remand, the trial court determined that the report was not the duplicative equivalent, which the People now concede. Although we find no error otherwise in the trial and related proceedings, on the basis of this finding on remand and the People’s concession, reversal is mandated by binding Court of Appeals authority (supra; People v Jones, 70 NY2d 547, 553; People v Novoa, 70 NY2d 490, 499). Concur — Lerner, P. J., Ellerin, Rubin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Alston, 254 A.D.2d 158, 684 N.Y.S.2d 877, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11150 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

254 A.D.2d 158 (People v. Alston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ranghelle
503 N.E.2d 1011 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
People v. Novoa
517 N.E.2d 219 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Jones
517 N.E.2d 865 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)