People v. Alston
This text of 126 A.D.2d 731 (People v. Alston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Pitaro, J.), dated June 13, 1985, which, after a hearing, granted that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30 (1) (a).
Ordered that the order is affirmed.
The defendant’s moving papers contained sworn allegations of all the facts essential to support that branch of her motion which sought to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30 (1) (a). The People conceded these allegations of fact by totally failing to respond to them in their papers submitted in opposition to the defendant’s omnibus motion (see, People v Gruden, 42 NY2d 214). Thus the court was required to summarily grant that branch of the defendant’s motion and dismiss the indictment (see, CPL 210.45 [4]; People v Gruden, supra; People v Gonzalez, 116 AD2d 735; People v Melendez, 92 AD2d 904).
In light of our determination we need not reach the remaining issues raised by the People on appeal. Niehoff, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 A.D.2d 731, 511 N.Y.S.2d 133, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-alston-nyappdiv-1987.