People v. Alsaidi

2017 NY Slip Op 8530
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 6, 2017
Docket2015-03664
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 8530 (People v. Alsaidi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Alsaidi, 2017 NY Slip Op 8530 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

People v Alsaidi (2017 NY Slip Op 08530)
People v Alsaidi
2017 NY Slip Op 08530
Decided on December 6, 2017
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 6, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
L. PRISCILLA HALL, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
JEFFREY A. COHEN
BETSY BARROS, JJ.

2015-03664
(Ind. No. 14-00927)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Yahya Alsaidi, appellant.


Anthony Keogh, White Plains, NY, for appellant.

Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, NY (Virginia A. Marciano of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Zambelli, J.), rendered April 21, 2015, convicting him of assault in the first degree, gang assault in the first degree, and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15[5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the jury's rejection of the defendant's justification defense and its verdict of guilt were not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Valentin, 29 NY3d 57, 61-62; People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633; People v Bennett, 279 AD2d 585).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

HALL, J.P., ROMAN, COHEN and BARROS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Mateo
811 N.E.2d 1053 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)
People v. Romero
859 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
The People v. Carlos Valentin
74 N.E.3d 632 (New York Court of Appeals, 2017)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Bennett
279 A.D.2d 585 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 8530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-alsaidi-nyappdiv-2017.