Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Almonte

People v. Almonte

102 A.D.3d 977, 958 N.Y.S.2d 600
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Almonte. Read the opinion of the Court — 81 A.D.3d 564 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 30, 2013·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Condon, J.), imposed July 23, 2010, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Stanley, 99 AD3d 955 [2012]; cf. People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 926 [2012]). Eng, P.J., Rivera, Leventhal and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Almonte, 102 A.D.3d 977, 958 N.Y.S.2d 600 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

102 A.D.3d 977 (People v. Almonte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Ramos
853 N.E.2d 222 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Maracle
973 N.E.2d 1272 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)
People v. Stanley
99 A.D.3d 955 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)