People v. Almonte

290 A.D.2d 559, 737 N.Y.S.2d 297, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 790
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 28, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 290 A.D.2d 559 (People v. Almonte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Almonte, 290 A.D.2d 559, 737 N.Y.S.2d 297, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), rendered May 5, 1998, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that a comment made by the prosecutor during summation was improper is unpreserved for appellate review, as he raised only a general objection and made no further objection or request for relief after the Supreme Court gave a curative instruction (see, People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19; People v Heide, 84 NY2d 943, 944; People v Mapp, 245 AD2d 307; People v Rosario, 195 AD2d 577). In any event, the contention is without merit, as the challenged comment constituted a fair response to the defense counsel’s summation (see, People v Halm, 81 NY2d 819, 821; People v Colon, 122 AD2d 151).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Cozier and Prudenti, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Almonte
308 A.D.2d 493 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
290 A.D.2d 559, 737 N.Y.S.2d 297, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-almonte-nyappdiv-2002.