People v. Almanzar
113 A.D.3d 527, 978 N.Y.2d 845
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 23, 2014·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
The information was not jurisdictionally defective. Allegations that defendant was behind the steering wheel of a car with its motor running satisfied the operation element of the offense charged (see People v Alamo, 34 NY2d 453 [1974]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Acosta, Andrias, Freedman and Feinman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Almanzar, 113 A.D.3d 527, 978 N.Y.2d 845 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).
113 A.D.3d 527 (People v. Almanzar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Galarza
2025 NY Slip Op 51914(U) (Kings Criminal Court, 2025)
People v. Darby (Gregory)
2025 NY Slip Op 50033(U) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Baafi (Clement)
75 Misc. 3d 133(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Vera (Mario)
75 Misc. 3d 130(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Narvaez (Dana)
72 Misc. 3d 128(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Avery (Virgil)
68 Misc. 3d 135(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)