People v. Almanzar
113 A.D.3d 527, 978 N.Y.2d 845
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 23, 2014
StatusPublished
This text of 113 A.D.3d 527 (People v. Almanzar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Almanzar, 113 A.D.3d 527, 978 N.Y.2d 845 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).
Opinion
The information was not jurisdictionally defective. Allegations that defendant was behind the steering wheel of a car with its motor running satisfied the operation element of the offense charged (see People v Alamo, 34 NY2d 453 [1974]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Acosta, Andrias, Freedman and Feinman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Alamo
315 N.E.2d 446 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
113 A.D.3d 527, 978 N.Y.2d 845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-almanzar-nyappdiv-2014.