People v. Almanzar

288 A.D.2d 482, 733 N.Y.S.2d 890, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11480

This text of 288 A.D.2d 482 (People v. Almanzar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Almanzar, 288 A.D.2d 482, 733 N.Y.S.2d 890, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11480 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Roman, J.), rendered December 1, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The prosecution’s summation did not constitute reversible [483]*483error because the summation was responsive to arguments and. issues raised by the defense (see, People v Patillo, 282 AD2d 692, lv denied 96 NY2d 866; People v Draksin, 145 AD2d 500). Friedmann, J. P., Smith, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Draksin
145 A.D.2d 500 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Patillo
282 A.D.2d 692 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
288 A.D.2d 482, 733 N.Y.S.2d 890, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-almanzar-nyappdiv-2001.