People v. Almanzar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Almanzar

288 A.D.2d 482, 733 N.Y.S.2d 890, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11480

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 26, 2001·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Roman, J.), rendered December 1, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The prosecution’s summation did not constitute reversible [483]*483error because the summation was responsive to arguments and. issues raised by the defense (see, People v Patillo, 282 AD2d 692, lv denied 96 NY2d 866; People v Draksin, 145 AD2d 500). Friedmann, J. P., Smith, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Roman, J.), rendered December 1, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The prosecution’s summation did not constitute reversible [483]*483error because the summation was responsive to arguments and. issues raised by the defense (see, People v Patillo, 282 AD2d 692, lv denied 96 NY2d 866; People v Draksin, 145 AD2d 500). Friedmann, J. P., Smith, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur..

People v. Almanzar, 288 A.D.2d 482, 733 N.Y.S.2d 890, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11480 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

288 A.D.2d 482 (People v. Almanzar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related