People v. Allison

Illinois Supreme Court

People v. Allison

119 N.E.2d 746, 3 Ill. 2d 24

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedMay 24, 1954

DocketNo. 33040

StatusPublished

This text of 119 N.E.2d 746 (People v. Allison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Allison, 119 N.E.2d 746, 3 Ill. 2d 24 (Ill. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Daily

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a writ of error prosecuted by Chris D. Allison, Jr., who, together with Keith Duden and one Donald Walton, was convicted in the circuit court of Adams County of the crime of setting at liberty from the county jail, a prisoner who had been convicted of rape. A separate writ of error has been sued out by Duden and, in an opinion delivered this day, the judgment of conviction has been affirmed as to him. See: People v. Duden, ante, p. 16.

Inasmuch as the facts, the assignments of error, the issues, the briefs and arguments presented and the authorities relied upon are identical in each cause, every question raised by the plaintiff in error here has been decided in the Duden case adversely to him. For the reasons stated in the opinion in the Duden case, the judgment of conviction entered against the plaintiff in error must be and is affirmed.

, Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Daily

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a writ of error prosecuted by Chris D. Allison, Jr., who, together with Keith Duden and one Donald Walton, was convicted in the circuit court of Adams County of the crime of setting at liberty from the county jail, a prisoner who had been convicted of rape. A separate writ of error has been sued out by Duden and, in an opinion delivered this day, the judgment of conviction has been affirmed as to him. See: People v. Duden, ante, p. 16.

Inasmuch as the facts, the assignments of error, the issues, the briefs and arguments presented and the authorities relied upon are identical in each cause, every question raised by the plaintiff in error here has been decided in the Duden case adversely to him. For the reasons stated in the opinion in the Duden case, the judgment of conviction entered against the plaintiff in error must be and is affirmed.

, Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 N.E.2d 746, 3 Ill. 2d 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-allison-ill-1954.