People v. Allick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Allick

92 A.D.3d 588, 938 N.Y.2d 798

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 23, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 92 A.D.3d 588 (People v. Allick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Allick, 92 A.D.3d 588, 938 N.Y.2d 798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

[589]*589The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations, including its resolution of minor inconsistencies in testimony. The testimony of the two principal witnesses was consistent as to the material facts.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Tom, J.E, Friedman, Sweeny, Moskowitz and DeGrasse, JJ. [Prior Case History: 26 Misc 3d 1237(A), 2010 NY Slip Op 50437OJ).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[589]*589The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations, including its resolution of minor inconsistencies in testimony. The testimony of the two principal witnesses was consistent as to the material facts.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Tom, J.E, Friedman, Sweeny, Moskowitz and DeGrasse, JJ. [Prior Case History: 26 Misc 3d 1237(A), 2010 NY Slip Op 50437OJ).]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 A.D.3d 588, 938 N.Y.2d 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-allick-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack