People v. Allick
92 A.D.3d 588, 938 N.Y.2d 798
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Allick. Read the opinion of the Court — 72 A.D.3d 1615 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 23, 2012·Published
Opinion
[589]*589The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations, including its resolution of minor inconsistencies in testimony. The testimony of the two principal witnesses was consistent as to the material facts.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Tom, J.E, Friedman, Sweeny, Moskowitz and DeGrasse, JJ. [Prior Case History: 26 Misc 3d 1237(A), 2010 NY Slip Op 50437OJ).]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Allick, 92 A.D.3d 588, 938 N.Y.2d 798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
92 A.D.3d 588 (People v. Allick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)