People v. Alli

2021 NY Slip Op 06621, 199 A.D.3d 1012, 154 N.Y.S.3d 790
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 24, 2021
Docket2020-01485
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 06621 (People v. Alli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Alli, 2021 NY Slip Op 06621, 199 A.D.3d 1012, 154 N.Y.S.3d 790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

People v Alli (2021 NY Slip Op 06621)
People v Alli
2021 NY Slip Op 06621
Decided on November 24, 2021
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 24, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
BETSY BARROS
WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.

2020-01485

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Azeese Alli, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 2354/19)


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and Christopher Blira-Koessler of counsel; Lazaro Angeles on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Bruna DiBiase, J.), rendered January 17, 2020, convicting him of attempted assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating so much of the sentence as imposed mandatory surcharges and fees; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

As consented to by the People, we modify the judgment by vacating surcharges and fees imposed on the defendant (see CPL 420.35[2-a]; People v Henry P.-M, 196 AD3d 650, 651; People v Dyshawn B., 196 AD3d 638). Contrary to the defendant's contention, the portion of the sentence imposing a period of five years of probation was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, DUFFY, BARROS and FORD, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Henry P.-M.
2021 NY Slip Op 04499 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Santana v. Pena
2021 NY Slip Op 04486 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 06621, 199 A.D.3d 1012, 154 N.Y.S.3d 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-alli-nyappdiv-2021.