People v. Allen

140 A.D.3d 1674, 31 N.Y.S.3d 916
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Allen. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 A.D.3d 958

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Vincent M. Dinolfo, J.), rendered September 27, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]). As the People correctly concede, defendant did not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive his right to appeal. “Despite the existence of a written appeal waiver form signed by defendant and his attorney, no questions were asked of defendant about the appeal waiver and his understanding thereof” (People v Fry singer, 111 AD3d 1397, 1398 [2013]; see People v Briglin, 125 AD3d 1518, 1518-1519 [2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 926 [2015]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Present— Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, DeJoseph and NeMoyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Allen, 140 A.D.3d 1674, 31 N.Y.S.3d 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

140 A.D.3d 1674 (People v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Briglin
125 A.D.3d 1518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)