People v. Allen

57 A.D.3d 1383, 869 N.Y.2d 716
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 31, 2008·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[1384]*1384Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her, upon her plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]), criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (§ 220.16 [1]) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree (§ 220.09 [1]). We reject defendant’s contention that the sentences imposed on the counts of criminal sale and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree are unduly harsh and severe. “Defendant was sentenced in accordance with the plea bargain and should be bound by its terms” (People v McGovern, 265 AD2d 881 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 882 [2000]).

We further conclude, however, that the sentence imposed on the count of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree is illegal and cannot stand. We note that, because the sentence is illegal, we reach this issue despite defendant’s failure to raise it either at the time of sentencing or on appeal (see People v Adams, 45 AD3d 1346 [2007]; People v Martinez, 213 AD2d 1072 [1995]). Pursuant to Penal Law § 70.70 (3) (b), the sentence imposed for a second felony drug offender convicted of, inter alia, a class C felony offense must include a period of not less than IV2 or more than 3 years of postrelease supervision. Although criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree is a class C felony and defendant was a second felony drug offender, County Court failed to include a period of postrelease supervision in sentencing defendant on that count. We therefore modify the judgment by vacating the sentence imposed for criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and we remit the matter to County Court for resentencing on count three of the indictment (see People v Sparber, 10 NY3d 457, 469 [2008]). Inasmuch as the plea agreement provided in relevant part that defendant would be sentenced to a three-year period of postrelease supervision, defendant need not be afforded the opportunity to withdraw her [1385]*1385plea of guilty prior to resentencing (cf. People v Waggoner, 53 AD3d 1143 [2008]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Centra, Fahey, Pine and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Allen, 57 A.D.3d 1383, 869 N.Y.2d 716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

57 A.D.3d 1383 (People v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Simpson
2024 NY Slip Op 04887 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Gross
71 A.D.3d 1526 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)