People v. Allen

267 A.D.2d 993, 700 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13729
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[994]*994contention, the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant presented evidence that one of his companions, a former codefendant, resembled defendant, and that person was identified as the shooter by defendant and the others who accompanied them. The prosecution’s case was based almost entirely upon the victim’s identification of defendant as the shooter. Although “a different finding would not have been unreasonable,” it cannot be said that the Trial Judge, who had the opportunity to view the witnesses, “failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded” (People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J. — Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present— Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Allen, 267 A.D.2d 993, 700 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13729 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

267 A.D.2d 993 (People v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Jones
269 A.D.2d 799 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)