People v. Allen
225 A.D.2d 497, 639 N.Y.2d 691, 639 N.Y.S.2d 691, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3288
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Allen. Read the opinion of the Court — 203 A.D.2d 97 →
Opinion
We find nothing in the plea minutes to engender significant doubt as to the voluntariness or sufficiency of defendant’s plea. Accordingly, since defendant never challenged the validity of his plea allocution in the trial court, his appellate challenge thereto is unpreserved as a matter of law (People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ross, Williams and Tom, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Allen, 225 A.D.2d 497, 639 N.Y.2d 691, 639 N.Y.S.2d 691, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3288 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 497 (People v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Toxey
655 N.E.2d 160 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)