People v. Allen

204 A.D.2d 973, 614 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6774
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Allen. Read the opinion of the Court — 177 A.D.2d 700

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We agree with defendant that his purported waiver, as part of his guilty plea, of his right to appeal on constitutional double jeopardy grounds was invalid (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 280; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9; see also, People v Michael, 48 NY2d 1, 7). On the merits, however, we conclude that the court properly granted the People’s earlier motion for a mistrial based on manifest necessity (see, CPL 280.10 [3]; Matter of Enright v Siedlecki, 59 NY2d 195, 199-201). The court’s reliance on medical information that a key prosecution witness had suffered a massive heart attack was proper (see, Hall v Potoker, 49 NY2d 501, 507). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J.—Criminal Possession Weapon, 2nd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Balio, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Allen, 204 A.D.2d 973, 614 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6774 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

204 A.D.2d 973 (People v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Michael
394 N.E.2d 1134 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
Hall v. Potoker
403 N.E.2d 1210 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Enright v. Siedlecki
451 N.E.2d 176 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)