People v. Allen

159 A.D.2d 953, 552 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3234
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 1990·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428, 437), established defendant’s guilt of third degree burglary and petit larceny (see, People v Magsamen, 128 AD2d 646, 647, lv denied 70 NY2d 650; People v Anderson, 103 AD2d 1011, 1012). On this record we also conclude that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495; People v Pacheco, 135 AD2d 744, lv denied 71 NY2d 900). The trial court properly denied defendant’s motion for a mistrial. The witness’s identification of defendant was inadvertent (see, People v Hooker, 114 AD2d 514, lv denied 67 NY2d 885) and, in any event, no Wade hearing was required because the witness was acquainted with the defendant (see, People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543, 552). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Barr, J. — burglary, third degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Allen, 159 A.D.2d 953, 552 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3234 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

159 A.D.2d 953 (People v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. White
186 A.D.2d 1016 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)