People v. Allen (Aamir)
This text of People v. Allen (Aamir) (People v. Allen (Aamir)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Aamir Allen, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Lyle E. Frank, J.), rendered May 19, 2016, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and imposing sentence.
Per Curiam.
Judgment of conviction (Lyle E. Frank, J.), rendered May 19, 2016, affirmed.
Application of appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders, and upon an independent review of the record, agree that there is no valid appealable issue that could be raised on appeal.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: May 17, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
People v. Allen (Aamir), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-allen-aamir-nyappterm-2018.