People v. Allah

56 A.D.2d 550, 392 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10556
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Allah. Read the opinion of the Court — 66 A.D.2d 665

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered September 5, 1974, convicting defendant-appellant of, inter alia, robbery, first degree, and grand larceny, third degree, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss the larceny count, and otherwise affirmed. "Defendant, on the facts of this case, could not have committed the robbery without also committing the grand larceny, the counts being inclusory and concurrent (CPL 300.30, subd 4; People v Hayes, 43 AD2d 99, affd 35 NY2d 907). Where the verdict is comprised of inclusory concurrent counts a verdict of guilty on the greatest count is deemed a dismissal of every lesser count (CPL 300.40, subd 3, par [b]).” (People v Grier, 37 NY2d 847, 848.) Concur—Stevens, P. J., Lupiano, Birns, Capozzoli and Markewich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Allah, 56 A.D.2d 550, 392 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10556 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

56 A.D.2d 550 (People v. Allah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hayes
324 N.E.2d 365 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
People v. Grier
340 N.E.2d 471 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Hayes
43 A.D.2d 99 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)