People v. Aliseo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Aliseo

162 A.D.2d 537, 559 N.Y.S.2d 144, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7297

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 11, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 162 A.D.2d 537 (People v. Aliseo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Aliseo, 162 A.D.2d 537, 559 N.Y.S.2d 144, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7297 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), both rendered May 6, 1987, convicting him of burglary in the third degree under indictment No. 87-00363-01 and burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 87-00372-01, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), both rendered May 6, 1987, convicting him of burglary in the third degree under indictment No. 87-00363-01 and burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 87-00372-01, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 A.D.2d 537, 559 N.Y.S.2d 144, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-aliseo-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack