People v. Ali

2018 NY Slip Op 6791
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ali. Read the opinion of the Court — 192 A.D.3d 1132
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 11, 2018·No. 1831/15 7282·Published

Opinion

People v Ali (2018 NY Slip Op 06791)
People v Ali
2018 NY Slip Op 06791
Decided on October 11, 2018
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 11, 2018
Sweeny, J.P., Tom, Gesmer, Kern, Moulton, JJ.

1831/15 7282

[*1]7282A The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Jamar Ali, Defendant-Appellant.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Abigail Everett of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Kristian D. Amundsen of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ethan Greenberg, J.), rendered July 21, 2016, as amended August 17, 2016, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sexual act in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of two years, with eight years' postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed. Order, same court and Justice, entered on or about May 4, 2017, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

As to the appeal from the judgment of conviction, we perceive no basis for reducing the period of postrelease supervision.

As to defendant's civil appeal from his sex offender adjudication, we conclude that the court providently exercised its discretion in declining to grant defendant's request for a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). There were no mitigating factors that were not adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument, or that outweighed the seriousness of the underlying offense, which defendant committed against a teenager who was more than 20 years younger than himself.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: OCTOBER 11, 2018

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ali, 2018 NY Slip Op 6791 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

2018 NY Slip Op 6791 (People v. Ali) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)