People v. Algerio
110 A.D.2d 706, 489 N.Y.S.2d 144, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48601
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 8, 1985·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Defendant’s contentions with respect to the propriety of the prosecutor’s summation have not been preserved for appellate review as a matter of law (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, we conclude that the allegedly improper remarks did not serve to deprive defendant of fair trial (see, People v Roopchand, 107 AD2d 35). Titone, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Algerio, 110 A.D.2d 706, 489 N.Y.S.2d 144, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48601 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
110 A.D.2d 706 (People v. Algerio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. David C.
122 A.D.2d 277 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Malphurs
111 A.D.2d 266 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)