People v. Algarin
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Cassandra M. Mullen, J.), rendered May 28, 2013, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, assault in the third degree and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 2xh to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court erred in its determination that defendant opened the door to a modification of its Sandoval ruling. Nonetheless the error was harmless in light of the remaining overwhelming evidence of guilt.
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility, and its mixed verdict does not warrant a different conclusion (see People v Rayam, 94 NY2d 557 [2000]).
Defendant’s challenge to the court’s jury charge is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find no basis for reversal. Concur— Gonzalez, P.J., Sweeny, Renwick, Saxe and Feinman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
130 A.D.3d 401 (People v. Algarin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.