People v. Alfred M.

2019 NY Slip Op 3683
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 9, 2019
Docket9276 5770/02
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 3683 (People v. Alfred M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Alfred M., 2019 NY Slip Op 3683 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Alfred M. (2019 NY Slip Op 03683)
People v Alfred M.
2019 NY Slip Op 03683
Decided on May 9, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 9, 2019
Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Kapnick, Kahn, Oing, JJ.

9276 5770/02

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Alfred M., Defendant-Appellant.


Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Arthur H. Hopkirk of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Michael J. Yetter of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), entered on or about November 9, 2016, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). We do not find that there was any overassessment of points for defendant's prior criminal history. The mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument or were outweighed by aggravating factors, including the gravity of the underlying crimes, committed against children. Defendant has not demonstrated that his age and employment history would prevent him from committing similar crimes.

The record fails to support defendant's claim that the court based its denial of a departure on matters outside the record.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MAY 9, 2019

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 3683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-alfred-m-nyappdiv-2019.