People v. Alford

178 A.D.2d 418
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 2, 1991·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), rendered May 8, 1989, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant John Alford’s contention, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in ruling that, should he testify, the People could cross-examine him as to a 1986 conviction for attempted robbery in the second degree and as to the underlying facts only of a 1985 youthful offender adjudication for attempted robbery in the first degree. Because they involved theft, the prior crimes were highly probative of the defendant’s credibility (see, People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Kunzeman, J. P., Eiber, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Alford, 178 A.D.2d 418 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

178 A.D.2d 418 (People v. Alford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Aguayo
85 A.D.3d 809 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Preyer
198 A.D.2d 243 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Foncette
197 A.D.2d 533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)