People v. Alexis

2019 NY Slip Op 3982
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 22, 2019
DocketInd. No. 2420/14
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 3982 (People v. Alexis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Alexis, 2019 NY Slip Op 3982 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Alexis (2019 NY Slip Op 03982)
People v Alexis
2019 NY Slip Op 03982
Decided on May 22, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 22, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
JEFFREY A. COHEN
BETSY BARROS
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2016-02142
(Ind. No. 2420/14)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

James Alexis, appellant.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (A. Alexander Donn of counsel), for appellant.

John M. Ryan, Acting District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Anastasia Spanakos of counsel; Eleanor Reilly on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Robert A. Schwartz, J.), imposed February 17, 2016, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 339-342; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257; People v Espejo, 145 AD3d 1031). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255-256; People v Espejo, 145 AD3d at 1031).

BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, COHEN, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Espejo
2016 NY Slip Op 8880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 3982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-alexis-nyappdiv-2019.