People v. Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 24, 2026·No. 2023-00203·Published

Opinion

People v Alexander - 2026 NY Slip Op 03972
skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

People v Alexander

2026 NY Slip Op 03972

June 24, 2026

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Nkosi Alexander, appellant.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Decided on June 24, 2026

2023-00203, (Ind. No. 70083/22)

Francesca E. Connolly, J.P.

Paul Wooten

Lourdes M. Ventura

Lisa S. Ottley, JJ.

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Mark W. Vorkink of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Jean M. Joyce, and Ann Bordley of counsel), for respondent.

[*1]

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Heidi C. Cesare, J.), rendered January 3, 2023, convicting him of criminal possession of a firearm, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that Penal Law §§ 265.03(3) and 265.01-b(1) and Administrative Code of the City of New York § 10-131(i)(3) are unconstitutional in light of the decision of the United States Supreme Court in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v Bruen (597 US 1), and that the indictment was, therefore, defective. Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant's waiver of his right to appeal does not preclude appellate review of this contention, and the defendant does not lack standing to advance this contention (see People v Johnson, ___ NY3d ___, 2025 NY Slip Op 06528). However, the defendant's contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Cabrera, 41 NY3d 35, 42; People v Davidson, 98 NY2d 738, 739) and, in any event, without merit. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Bruen decision had no impact on the constitutionality of New York State's criminal possession of a weapon statutes (see People v Johnson, ___ NY3d ___, 2025 NY Slip Op 06528; People v Manners, 217 AD3d 683, 686).

CONNOLLY, J.P., WOOTEN, VENTURA and OTTLEY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Alexander, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

People v. Alexander (People v. Alexander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Davidson
780 N.E.2d 972 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
People v. Manners
217 A.D.3d 683 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Johnson
2025 NY Slip Op 06528 (New York Court of Appeals, 2025)