People v. Alexander

283 A.D.2d 243, 724 N.Y.S.2d 603, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5084
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Alexander. Read the opinion of the Court — 255 A.D.2d 708

Opinion

—On appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey Atlas, J.), rendered November 21, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, the application by assigned counsel to withdraw on the ground that the appeal is wholly frivolous (People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833) is granted to the extent of relieving counsel with compensation, assigning Steven Feinman, 48 Brook Farm Close, Chappaqua, New York 10514, as new counsel, and enlarging the time to re-perfect the appeal to the October 2001 Term of this Court.

In seeking to be relieved, assigned appellate counsel has submitted a brief carefully reviewing the record and identifying at least seven issues that might arguably support the appeal, but concluding that all of these issues are frivolous. While we express no opinion with respect to the merits, or lack thereof, of any possible issue, we conclude that this appeal is not so wholly frivolous as to warrant an affirmance pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738) and People v Saunders (supra). Concur — Lerner, J. P., Saxe, Buckley, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Alexander, 283 A.D.2d 243, 724 N.Y.S.2d 603, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5084 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

283 A.D.2d 243 (People v. Alexander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Saunders
52 A.D.2d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)