People v. Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Alexander

18 A.D.2d 1092, 239 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3931

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1963

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 18 A.D.2d 1092 (People v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Alexander, 18 A.D.2d 1092, 239 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3931 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the former County Court, Kings County, rendered December 13, 1961, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of burglary in the third degree and petit larceny, and imposing sentence upon him as a second felony offender. Judgment affirmed. Appellant contends thqt his constitutional rights were violated in that evidence was admitted at the trial which was obtained as a result of an illegal arrest. No objection having been made at the time of trial to the admission of the evidence, the issue cannot be raised now for the first time on appeal (People v. Wilson, 16 A D 2d 207). We have reviewed all the facts however. Based upon such review, it is our opinion: (1) that the proof, even with the disputed evidence excluded, amply supports the finding of guilt; and (2) that the interests of justice do not require a new trial in any event (cf. People v. Kelly, 12 N Y 2d 248). Ughetta, Acting P. J,, Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the former County Court, Kings County, rendered December 13, 1961, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of burglary in the third degree and petit larceny, and imposing sentence upon him as a second felony offender. Judgment affirmed. Appellant contends thqt his constitutional rights were violated in that evidence was admitted at the trial which was obtained as a result of an illegal arrest. No objection having been made at the time of trial to the admission of the evidence, the issue cannot be raised now for the first time on appeal (People v. Wilson, 16 A D 2d 207). We have reviewed all the facts however. Based upon such review, it is our opinion: (1) that the proof, even with the disputed evidence excluded, amply supports the finding of guilt; and (2) that the interests of justice do not require a new trial in any event (cf. People v. Kelly, 12 N Y 2d 248). Ughetta, Acting P. J,, Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 1092, 239 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-alexander-nyappdiv-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack