People v. Alexander
This text of 555 N.E.2d 905 (People v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People and indulging all reasonable inferences in the People’s favor (see, People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428, 437; People v Benzinger, 36 NY2d 29, 32), we conclude that the evidence is legally sufficient to support defendant’s conviction for first degree robbery (Penal Law § 160.15 [1]) and second degree murder (Penal Law § 125.25 [3]) beyond a reasonable doubt. No other issue has been preserved for our review.
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the [981]*981Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
555 N.E.2d 905, 75 N.Y.2d 979, 556 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 1019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-alexander-ny-1990.