People v. Alejandro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Alejandro

55 A.D.3d 479, 865 N.Y.S.2d 554

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 30, 2008·Published

Opinion

Supreme Court, New York County (Michael R. Ambrecht, J.), entered on or about February 14, 2007, which denied defendant’s motion for resentencing, unanimously affirmed.

Order, The court properly exercised its discretion under the Drug Law Reform Act when it determined that “substantial justice” dictated denial of resentencing (L 2005, ch 643, § 1), in light of the seriousness of defendant’s conduct (see eg. People v Jones, 50 AD3d 282 [2008]; People v Salcedo, 40 AD3d 356 [2007], lv dismissed 9 NY3d 850 [2007]). Concur—Lippman, EJ, Mazzarelli, Williams, Buckley and Renwick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Supreme Court, New York County (Michael R. Ambrecht, J.), entered on or about February 14, 2007, which denied defendant’s motion for resentencing, unanimously affirmed.

Order, The court properly exercised its discretion under the Drug Law Reform Act when it determined that “substantial justice” dictated denial of resentencing (L 2005, ch 643, § 1), in light of the seriousness of defendant’s conduct (see eg. People v Jones, 50 AD3d 282 [2008]; People v Salcedo, 40 AD3d 356 [2007], lv dismissed 9 NY3d 850 [2007]). Concur—Lippman, EJ, Mazzarelli, Williams, Buckley and Renwick, JJ.

People v. Alejandro, 55 A.D.3d 479, 865 N.Y.S.2d 554 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

55 A.D.3d 479 (People v. Alejandro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related