People v. Aldinger

242 A.D.2d 955, 665 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10569

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a plea of guilty of unautho[956]*956rized use of a vehicle in the second degree. The record establishes that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to appeal (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 283). The contention that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe does not survive that waiver (see, People v Allen, 82 NY2d 761). Nor does the contention that Supreme Court erred in failing to conduct a hearing on the amount of restitution because the legality of the sentence is not implicated in this case (see, People v Callahan, supra, at 281). Because defendant agreed to the amount of restitution, no hearing was required (see, People v Kelly, 238 AD2d 938). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Tills, J.—Unauthorized Use Vehicle, 2nd Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Aldinger, 242 A.D.2d 955, 665 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10569 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

242 A.D.2d 955 (People v. Aldinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Allen
623 N.E.2d 1170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Kelly
238 A.D.2d 938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)